NOTES STORYBOARDS PULSE BEST IDEAS WEBINARS

AI Pulse

Harper Hunt

February 10, 2026

Anthropic's Agentic AI Surge, Software Sector Shakeout, and Rising Concerns Over AI's Psychological and Workforce Impacts

Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 Release Reshapes AI Competitive Landscape and Triggers Market Disruption

The artificial intelligence competitive environment experienced a decisive shift last week as Anthropic solidified its position at the forefront of the industry. Perscient's semantic signature tracking language asserting that Anthropic or Claude leads the artificial intelligence competition registered a z-score of 3.9, reflecting a sharp 1.8 week-over-week increase that places it among the highest values in our dataset. As of February 9, prediction market bettors on Polymarket now assign Anthropic a 68% probability of holding the title of "Best AI Model" by month's end, compared to Google's 21% and OpenAI's trailing 6%.

The catalyst arrived on February 5 when Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.6, featuring a one-million-token context window in beta and "AI agent teams" capable of dividing tasks among agents that communicate and process in parallel. According to GuruFocus, the model outperforms competitors like GPT-5.2 by nearly 10% and extends capabilities beyond programming into financial analysis. One analyst on social media noted that Opus 4.6 "plans more carefully, sustains agentic tasks for longer, operates reliably in massive codebases, and catches its own mistakes," and that Anthropic outscored its own predecessor by 190 Elo points in just three months.

Claude Code, the company's coding assistant, surpassed $1 billion in revenue just six months after its public launch. For perspective, Salesforce required a decade to reach that milestone. SemiAnalysis now predicts that Claude Code will be responsible for more than 20% of daily commits on GitHub by year's end, up from approximately 4% currently.

Our semantic signature tracking language asserting that autonomous agent capabilities advance language models rose by 0.3 week-over-week to a z-score of 1.2. Claude Code now enables terminal-based development without supervision, while industry analysts project that the agentic AI market will expand from $7.8 billion today to over $52 billion by 2030. Gartner predicts that 40% of enterprise applications will embed AI agents by the end of 2026.

Perscient's semantic signature tracking language asserting that OpenAI leads artificial intelligence competition declined by 0.2 week-over-week to a z-score of a flat 0.0. The prediction market spread has been characterized as "a clear indictment" of OpenAI's recent incremental update cycle compared to Anthropic's generational leaps. As one Chinese-language commentator observed, enterprise customers prioritize reliability, safety compliance, and predictable outputs over benchmark supremacy. The rivalry even spilled into Super Bowl advertising, in which Anthropic took jabs at OpenAI's ad testing in ChatGPT while committing to an ad-free Claude experience.

AI-Driven Disruption Triggers "SaaSpocalypse" in Software Stocks and Heightens Workforce Anxiety

Anthropic's competitive gains translated immediately into market turmoil. Over six trading sessions, the S&P 500 software and services index shed approximately $830 billion in market value, falling nearly 13% from its October peak. In the span of 48 hours following the Claude Opus 4.6 announcement, $285 billion evaporated from global software stocks.

"We call it the 'SaaSpocalypse,' an apocalypse for software-as-a-service stocks," said Jeffrey Favuzza, an equity trader at Jefferies, according to Bloomberg. "Trading is very much 'get me out' style selling." The selloff was triggered specifically by Anthropic's new legal tool, which demonstrated capabilities that investors fear could make swaths of professional services software obsolete. Thomson Reuters fell by 15.8% in its worst day on record, LegalZoom dropped nearly 20%, and FactSet declined by 10%.

Our semantic signature tracking language asserting that AI competency is required for employment or professional success rose by 0.2 week-over-week to a z-score of 1.2. Perscient's semantic signature tracking language predicting that AI will eliminate legal profession employment increased by 0.3 week-over-week to a z-score of 0.0, moving from below-average to average density. Baker McKenzie announced plans to cut approximately 700 positions, roughly 10% of its global business services staff, citing growing reliance on AI. As one observer noted, "the jobs that required a degree, a suit, and $200k in student debt are disappearing before the blue collar ones."

The semantic signature tracking language predicting that AI will eliminate programming or developer jobs remained elevated at a z-score of 0.7, reflecting a 0.1 week-over-week increase. According to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, AI-driven layoffs reached 55,000 across the US in 2025, more than twelve times the figure from two years earlier. Of those losses, 51,000 occurred in technology, concentrated in states like California and Washington. Employee concerns about job loss due to AI have jumped from 28% in 2024 to 40% in 2026, according to preliminary findings from Mercer's Global Talent Trends survey.

Our semantic signature tracking language characterizing AI's primary utility as limited to coding applications rose by 0.4 week-over-week to a z-score of 0.5. Yet the legal sector selloff suggests that this narrative may be shifting as AI capabilities expand into professional services. One market analyst captured the mood: "ServiceNow, Salesforce, SAP. They all built billion-dollar businesses on the same bet: enterprises are too incompetent to build their own tools. AI just inverted the math. Now one engineer with Claude or Cursor can ship features in days that used to take a vendor months." A chief investment officer warned that "this is a canary in the coal mine for the labor market."

AI and Mental Health Concerns Intensify as Media Scrutiny of Psychological Risks Grows

Alongside workforce disruption, media attention to AI's psychological risks has intensified. Perscient's semantic signature tracking language asserting that AI will increase mental health problems or psychological harm registered a z-score of 1.5, among the highest values in our dataset.

The nonprofit patient safety organization ECRI placed AI chatbot misuse at the top of its annual list of healthcare technology hazards for 2026. According to ECRI's report, chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot "are programmed to sound confident and to always provide an answer to satisfy the user, even when the answer isn't reliable." The organization documented instances where chatbots suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, and even invented body parts while maintaining an authoritative tone.

Our semantic signature tracking language arguing against AI for mental health or therapeutic purposes held steady at a z-score of 0.6. Researchers at Brown University found that AI chatbots routinely violate core mental health ethics standards, including inappropriately navigating crisis situations, providing misleading responses that reinforce negative beliefs, and creating false impressions of empathy. The American Psychological Association has warned the Federal Trade Commission that chatbot companies are using "deceptive practices" by positioning themselves as mental health providers.

Surveys of more than 2,000 members of the American Psychiatric Association and over 770 members of the American Counseling Association revealed profound worries about AI chatbot usage, particularly regarding risks of delusions and unhealthy dependencies among vulnerable users. Dr. Marketa Wills, CEO of the APA, noted that "as we've seen these addictions, really, to AI and chatbots emerge, it makes us, as a field, be more cautious."

Yet the semantic signature tracking language suggesting that AI provides meaningful companionship or friendship rose by 0.2 week-over-week to a z-score of 0.7. Across the country, teens and young adults increasingly turn to AI companions for emotional support and relationship advice. Teens often describe AI as easier to talk to than people because it responds instantly, stays calm, and feels available at all hours. That consistency can feel reassuring but can also create problematic attachment. Multiple suicides have been linked to AI companion interactions where vulnerable individuals shared suicidal thoughts with chatbots instead of seeking professional help.

Our semantic signature tracking language asserting that AI reduces human intelligence or cognitive abilities rose slightly to a z-score of 0.5. A study published by Anthropic on February 2 examined how software engineers acquire new knowledge with and without AI tools. The AI-assisted group completed tasks more quickly but achieved only 50% mastery on subsequent comprehension quizzes, while the manual group reached 67% mastery. Danish psychiatrist Søren Dinesen Østergaard, who previously warned about conversational AI's mental health consequences, has issued a new warning focusing on potential degradation of human intelligence itself through cognitive offloading.

Clinical experts argue that while AI can provide convenience and information, it lacks the essential human elements of insight, empathy, and a therapeutic relationship built over time. As one Psychology Today analysis observed, "AI systems exploit the cognitive biases and psychological vulnerabilities that make us poor judges of AI risk. AI can simulate empathy while completely lacking care."

Archived Pulse

February 03, 2026

  • China's Accelerating AI Offensive
  • AI Productivity Narrative Gains Traction as Bubble Concerns Persist
  • AI Mental Health Risks Draw Regulatory Scrutiny

January 27, 2026

  • The Great AI Infrastructure Debate Continues
  • Google's Gemini Surge Putting Pressure on Peers
  • Energy Infrastructure Emerges as the Decisive Constraint in AI Competition

January 20, 2026

  • China's AI Sector Gains Momentum One Year After DeepSeek's "Sputnik Moment"
  • Hyperscale Infrastructure Spending Continues Despite Growing Questions About Returns
  • AI Skills Emerge as a Workforce Imperative Amid Mental Health and Social Concerns

January 14, 2026

  • AI Infrastructure Skepticism Continues Rise as Capex Fatigue Meets Energy Constraints
  • Agentic AI Emerges as the Enterprise Battleground of 2026
  • Consulting Industry Continued to Bear the Brunt of Expected Disruption

January 06, 2026

  • Hyperscale Infrastructure Expansion Faces Bipartisan Resistance
  • AI Companionship Use Cases Proliferate, Exacerbate Mental Health Concerns
  • AI Competition Narratives Emphasizing Efficiency

December 30, 2025

  • Hyperscale Capex Doubts Creep in Alongside Soaring Investor Scrutiny
  • Overregulation Concerns Rise Following Federal Preemption Push
  • AI Skills Imperative Intensifies

December 22, 2025

  • Capex Skepticism Mounts Amid December Market Volatility
  • Enterprise Skepticism Remains Despite Agentic AI Advances
  • US AI Exceptionalism Framing Faces Growing Scrutiny

December 16, 2025

  • Hyperscale Infrastructure Spending Defies Persistent Skepticism
  • AI Productivity Gains Show Early Signs of Reaching Corporate Bottom Lines
  • US-China AI Competition Intensifies as Both Nations Pursue Divergent Strategies

December 09, 2025

  • OpenAI's "Code Red" Signals Intensifying Competition in the AI Race
  • AI Capex Skepticism Grows as Hyperscale Builds Face Mounting Questions
  • AI's Role in Loneliness Draws Intensifying Scrutiny

December 01, 2025

  • Investor Skepticism Mounts Over an AI and Data Center CapEx…Bubble?
  • Anthropic Emerges as Competitive Force as AI Race Narrative Intensifies
  • The Death of Consulting Narrative Just Won’t Die

November 24, 2025

  • Mounting Skepticism Over AI Infrastructure Spending Reaches New Heights
  • AI Race Leadership Narrative Shifts as Google Gains Ground
  • AI Mental Health Applications Draw Heightened Scrutiny

November 17, 2025

  • Hyperscale Infrastructure Investment Narratives Accelerates Despite Growing Scrutiny
  • Power Generation Capacity an Increasing Focus of Infrastructure Narratives
  • Consulting Industry Faces Transformation from AI Adoption

November 10, 2025

  • Hyperscale AI Infrastructure Spending Reaches Historic Highs
  • AI Race Geopolitics Intensifies Between US and China
  • Mental Health Risks from AI Chatbots Intensify Regulatory Scrutiny
pulse

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.