Markets Pulse
WeeklyNovember 17, 2025

AI Pulse November 17, 2025

AI Infrastructure Narratives Expand Again as Energy Comes into Focus

Hyperscale Infrastructure Investment Narratives Accelerates Despite Growing Scrutiny

Perscient's semantic signature tracking expectations for continued hyperscale infrastructure expansion once again strengthened, reaching a z-score this week of 5.29, marking the signature's strongest reading on record. This narrative density reflects a global infrastructure spending trajectory that shows no signs of slowing. According to IoT Analytics, data center equipment and infrastructure spending reached $290 billion in 2024, with projections pointing toward sustained double-digit growth across seven key segments through 2030, potentially reaching a combined market of $1 trillion.

The scale of commitment from major technology companies underscores this momentum. Anthropic announced plans for a $50 billion nationwide infrastructure build-out, beginning with data centers in Texas and New York. This follows OpenAI's securing of more than $1.4 trillion in deals with Nvidia, Broadcom, Oracle, and major cloud providers. JPMorgan analysis suggests that global data center and AI infrastructure spending could reach $5 trillion, with demand for compute capacity remaining what the firm describes as "astronomical."

Perscient's signature monitoring the narrative of massive and growing AI capital expenditures rose by 0.21 to a z-score of 2.33, as stories of regional competition for these investments became increasingly common. Pennsylvania unveiled a $70 billion initiative designed to attract major data center projects, and the International Energy Agency reports the world will spend $580 billion on data centers this year—$40 billion more than will be spent finding new oil supplies. Asia's rapid adoption of AI and hyperscale cloud services is driving an investment wave across that region as well.

The support for these activities seems to be at least related in part to fears that those who do not invest will be left behind.  Perscient's signature tracking this argument rose modestly to a z-score of 0.93 this week. The relative absence of concern about infrastructure investment risks stands in contrast to occasional warnings about AI valuations and bubble concerns, though these remain secondary to the dominant narrative of continued expansion.

Power Generation Capacity an Increasing Focus of Infrastructure Narratives

That continued expansion, however, is dependent on the growth in power generation capacity and energy accessibility. Perscient's semantic signature monitoring narratives arguing that the winner of AI will be whichever country is capable of expanding its energy output strengthened by 0.33 to reach a z-score of 1.96. The intensification occurs as China demonstrates growing capabilities across multiple dimensions of the technology race.

China has overtaken the US in monthly downloads of AI models and leads in AI publications and patents, accounting for 69.7% of all AI patents as of 2023. Chinese firms including DeepSeek, Alibaba, and Moonshot have released AI models approaching the capabilities of leading US systems, spurred by a government that has made AI leadership a national priority. If the competition fundamentally revolves around infrastructure capacity—the ability to construct and power massive data centers—China may hold advantages through subsidized electricity and streamlined regulatory processes.

The strategic calculus in both Washington and Beijing increasingly treats AI success as providing significant military, economic, and societal advantages. The US appears focused on racing toward artificial general intelligence, while China emphasizes application of existing AI technology across its economy and the streamlined generation of necessary accompanying energy resources.

The compute gap remains substantial but potentially narrowing. The US maintains total AI compute of 39.7 million petaflops—half the world's total—while China's compute stands at 400,000 petaflops, reflecting the impact of US export restrictions. However, China's government has directed state-funded data centers to eliminate foreign AI chips, a move that will impose costs on Beijing but signals determination to develop domestic alternatives. The directive requires facilities less than 30% complete to remove chips already installed, demonstrating the priority placed on technological self-sufficiency despite near-term inefficiencies.

Consulting Industry Faces Transformation from AI Adoption

AI capex is fueling narratives of significant structural changes in various industries, too. Perscient's semantic signature monitoring narratives about AI eliminating consulting jobs rose by 0.53 to reach a z-score of 1.78, representing both the largest one-week increase among all signatures and the highest level ever recorded for this particular narrative thread. The signature's movement reflects growing industry discussion about AI fundamentally reshaping the traditional hiring model of professional services firms.

A CNBC survey of senior HR leaders found that 89% expect AI to impact jobs next year, with 45% saying AI will affect nearly half or more of all positions. McKinsey projected earlier this year that artificial intelligence could replace up to 30% of consulting jobs globally by 2030. The automation pressure falls particularly heavily on entry-level roles, which have traditionally formed the foundation of the consulting pyramid structure. New research from HFS Research indicates that 65% of enterprises say traditional consulting models no longer deliver value, with companies increasingly turning to AI-powered alternatives.

The transformation extends beyond simple task automation. By 2027, consulting firms are expected to operate with fewer entry-level hires and more specialized workforces, with teams that are smaller, faster, and more technology-focused. This restructuring directly impacts the traditional career progression model that has defined the industry for decades, creating pressure not just on junior roles but demanding that consultants at all levels elevate their capabilities to work alongside AI systems.

Perscient's broader signature tracking narratives about AI transforming white-collar work more generally remained stronger than average at a z-score of 0.69, suggesting that this is an especially pronounced element of a broader narrative. The consulting industry's challenges represent a particularly acute case of dynamics affecting knowledge work across sectors, though the pyramid structure of professional services firms makes them especially vulnerable to AI-driven disruption of entry-level positions.

Recent Pulses

Markets PulseWeeklySep 22, 2026

Markets Pulse September 15, 2026

The regime-change story arrives without any accompanying fear language. Every flight-to-safety signature — Treasurys, Swiss franc, yen, gold, money market funds — sits deep in negative territory, geopolitical and monetary policy uncertainty signatures were flat, and risk-on and risk-off readings have converged to nearly the same level just below zero. Media are narrating a supply shock, a five-percent ten-year, and a first hike since 2023 while conspicuously declining to counsel defensive positioning. Election-season transfer proposals collided with a hardening sovereign-risk story, and media asserted both outcomes at once. The helicopter-money signature registered the largest single move in the file, and stimulus-check predictions rose with it, yet signatures tracking debt paydown, deficit reduction, and austerity legislation also strengthened in the same week, while fiscal policy uncertainty remained flat. Commentators are expressing conviction about incompatible fiscal futures rather than doubt. Simultaneously, signatures tying runaway spending to higher Treasury yields, and those linking bond weakness to deficits and unfunded tax cuts, all gained, and claims that Treasurys are pricing genuine default risk moved into positive territory. Taken together, Sections 1 and 2 describe a media framework in which monetary and fiscal policy are pulling in opposite directions. Coverage pairs a hawkish Fed responding to oil-driven inflation with a proposed trillion-dollar household giveaway, and the reserve-currency channel sharpened alongside it: the signature tying dollar-status threats specifically to debt sustainability rose while the generic version held flat. Claims that White House pressure on foreign Treasury holders is deterring buyers remain the densest reading in the entire file, even as it eased slightly, and official-sector gold substitution language stayed elevated without accelerating further. Tariff politics are running in reverse, and the war has been absorbed into the same affordability argument. The signature tracking broad public opposition to tariffs climbed to one of the highest standings in the file while claims of public support weakened further, and the stated rationale rotated decisively: reshoring-manufacturing arguments dropped hard while "make other countries pay their fair share" and negotiating-leverage framings gained. Directional language turned two-sided for the first time in months. Bridging Sections 1 and 3, voter coverage now treats tariffs and the conflict as a single price story, which the K-shaped-economy framing organizes into a midterm affordability fight — notably, the market version of that bifurcation narrative eased even as chip stocks sold off, and the argument that investors have no alternative to US large-cap growth has effectively vanished from coverage.

Markets PulseWeeklySep 22, 2026

Markets Pulse

Next release: September 29, 2026

Private Credit PulseBiweeklySep 22, 2026

Private Credit Pulse

Next release: October 06, 2026