AI Infrastructure Narratives Expand Again as Energy Comes into Focus
November 17, 2025
AI Infrastructure Narratives Expand Again as Energy Comes into Focus
Hyperscale Infrastructure Investment Narratives Accelerates Despite Growing Scrutiny
Perscient's semantic signature tracking expectations for continued hyperscale infrastructure expansion once again strengthened, reaching a z-score this week of 5.29, marking the signature's strongest reading on record. This narrative density reflects a global infrastructure spending trajectory that shows no signs of slowing. According to IoT Analytics, data center equipment and infrastructure spending reached $290 billion in 2024, with projections pointing toward sustained double-digit growth across seven key segments through 2030, potentially reaching a combined market of $1 trillion.
The scale of commitment from major technology companies underscores this momentum. Anthropic announced plans for a $50 billion nationwide infrastructure build-out, beginning with data centers in Texas and New York. This follows OpenAI's securing of more than $1.4 trillion in deals with Nvidia, Broadcom, Oracle, and major cloud providers. JPMorgan analysis suggests that global data center and AI infrastructure spending could reach $5 trillion, with demand for compute capacity remaining what the firm describes as "astronomical."
Perscient's signature monitoring the narrative of massive and growing AI capital expenditures rose by 0.21 to a z-score of 2.33, as stories of regional competition for these investments became increasingly common. Pennsylvania unveiled a $70 billion initiative designed to attract major data center projects, and the International Energy Agency reports the world will spend $580 billion on data centers this year—$40 billion more than will be spent finding new oil supplies. Asia's rapid adoption of AI and hyperscale cloud services is driving an investment wave across that region as well.
The support for these activities seems to be at least related in part to fears that those who do not invest will be left behind. Perscient's signature tracking this argument rose modestly to a z-score of 0.93 this week. The relative absence of concern about infrastructure investment risks stands in contrast to occasional warnings about AI valuations and bubble concerns, though these remain secondary to the dominant narrative of continued expansion.
Power Generation Capacity an Increasing Focus of Infrastructure Narratives
That continued expansion, however, is dependent on the growth in power generation capacity and energy accessibility. Perscient's semantic signature monitoring narratives arguing that the winner of AI will be whichever country is capable of expanding its energy output strengthened by 0.33 to reach a z-score of 1.96. The intensification occurs as China demonstrates growing capabilities across multiple dimensions of the technology race.
China has overtaken the US in monthly downloads of AI models and leads in AI publications and patents, accounting for 69.7% of all AI patents as of 2023. Chinese firms including DeepSeek, Alibaba, and Moonshot have released AI models approaching the capabilities of leading US systems, spurred by a government that has made AI leadership a national priority. If the competition fundamentally revolves around infrastructure capacity—the ability to construct and power massive data centers—China may hold advantages through subsidized electricity and streamlined regulatory processes.
The strategic calculus in both Washington and Beijing increasingly treats AI success as providing significant military, economic, and societal advantages. The US appears focused on racing toward artificial general intelligence, while China emphasizes application of existing AI technology across its economy and the streamlined generation of necessary accompanying energy resources.
The compute gap remains substantial but potentially narrowing. The US maintains total AI compute of 39.7 million petaflops—half the world's total—while China's compute stands at 400,000 petaflops, reflecting the impact of US export restrictions. However, China's government has directed state-funded data centers to eliminate foreign AI chips, a move that will impose costs on Beijing but signals determination to develop domestic alternatives. The directive requires facilities less than 30% complete to remove chips already installed, demonstrating the priority placed on technological self-sufficiency despite near-term inefficiencies.
Consulting Industry Faces Transformation from AI Adoption
AI capex is fueling narratives of significant structural changes in various industries, too. Perscient's semantic signature monitoring narratives about AI eliminating consulting jobs rose by 0.53 to reach a z-score of 1.78, representing both the largest one-week increase among all signatures and the highest level ever recorded for this particular narrative thread. The signature's movement reflects growing industry discussion about AI fundamentally reshaping the traditional hiring model of professional services firms.
A CNBC survey of senior HR leaders found that 89% expect AI to impact jobs next year, with 45% saying AI will affect nearly half or more of all positions. McKinsey projected earlier this year that artificial intelligence could replace up to 30% of consulting jobs globally by 2030. The automation pressure falls particularly heavily on entry-level roles, which have traditionally formed the foundation of the consulting pyramid structure. New research from HFS Research indicates that 65% of enterprises say traditional consulting models no longer deliver value, with companies increasingly turning to AI-powered alternatives.
The transformation extends beyond simple task automation. By 2027, consulting firms are expected to operate with fewer entry-level hires and more specialized workforces, with teams that are smaller, faster, and more technology-focused. This restructuring directly impacts the traditional career progression model that has defined the industry for decades, creating pressure not just on junior roles but demanding that consultants at all levels elevate their capabilities to work alongside AI systems.
Perscient's broader signature tracking narratives about AI transforming white-collar work more generally remained stronger than average at a z-score of 0.69, suggesting that this is an especially pronounced element of a broader narrative. The consulting industry's challenges represent a particularly acute case of dynamics affecting knowledge work across sectors, though the pyramid structure of professional services firms makes them especially vulnerable to AI-driven disruption of entry-level positions.
DISCLOSURES
This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.
